
Will the Includer come to life?
I submitted my third report for the Knight Foundation. One more quarter to go! It’s strange to see an idea – The Includer – gasping for air. You will finish the race, you must! Includer!
Dear Bodil Fox and Gary Kebbel,
Bodil, Thank you for reminding me to send in my third report for the Knight Foundation, which I include below, and share with our working group Learn How To Learn.
Gary, I’m not getting comments at my blog or links to my blog. What should I do, if anything? Whereas, we have quite a lot of activity at our email groups and wiki. Does that activity satisfy the requirements of my contract?
Thank you for this award!
Anticipated Outcomes. Progress will be measured by:
- the number of blog posts,
- the quality of my content and
- the number of reader comments
Tides’ grant agreement with the Knight Foundation asks to measure
- the frequency of new blog posts,
- the number of responses by others,
- the length of various conversations,
- and the number of different people contributing to the conversation will be used to measure the Blogger’s efforts.
- They also will be measured by the number of other blogs linked to them.
- The quality of the blogs – do they link out to others, do they supply their comments with hyperlink references.
- The number of unique visits to MediaShift blog will also be monitored.
1. Please list each required project activity and tell us if, and when, you achieved it.
I am blogging at http://www.includer.org as agreed earlier. I blogged 14 posts (Episode 28 through Episode 42) in March, April and May of 2009. They total about 8,500 words, which is about 19 printed pages. I have included about 24 pictures. I wrote about some 40 people and their work, some as memorable characters. I have given some 110 links. My posts looked at the Includer from a variety of angles:
- User dynamics (Episode 29)
- Strategy (Episode 33)
- Proposals (Episode 30, 34)
- Sample content (Episode 31, 40, 42)
- Knight News Challenge: (Episode 28)
- System infrastructure (Episode 39)
- Technology development (Episode 32, 35, 36, 41)
- Key contacts (Episode 38)
- Organizational dynamics (none)
- Usage survey (Episode 37)
I am grateful to Minciu Sodas members for letters which I used for interesting posts. Some discussed examples of issues relevant for potential Includer users with marginal Internet access, such organizing a business for wedding pictures, becoming an ICT technologist and building pit latrines. Some discussed relevant advances in technology such as new Internet cables to East Africa, the use of MMC cards instead of USB flash drives, and opening up PayPal accounts from Africa. Others discussed obstacles such as “the viral divide”. I wrote about two proposals, including one that was accepted, which was to organize global teams to promote Mornflake cereal. I also wrote up my overall strategy for our lab.
Almost every post makes clear that we have a lively discussion at our lab. However, this discussion is taking place within the posts. We’re also reaching out and being found. “Vagrant netizen” Lorraine Lee wrote from Michigan that she, too, faces the digital divide and would like an Includer. Hardware hacker Marko Makela responded to Ricardo’s idea of using MMC cards. Pamela McLean and I wrote a post for Christian Crumlish’s new book. We get about 20 posts a month at Kiyavilo Msekwa’s working group Learn How To Learn which is the base for our work. We also get more than 100 posts per month from our other working groups with African leaders such as Samwel Kongere’s Mendenyo. And we get queries at our WorkNets wiki.
I received maybe 1 comment at my blog. I think we’re not getting comments at our blog for the following reasons:
- The center of our activity is elsewhere: our email groups, our wiki and our chat;
- Blogs work best as social media for bloggers and their regular readers, but people with marginal Internet access tend to be neither;
- Blogs receive hundreds of false comments from spammers, and nowadays, comments are often never posted, which means that overall many people use them less and less as they are not worth the trouble.
- I can’t and don’t encourage our participants to “respond” except in ways that are easiest for them, especially because many are poor or overworked.
- The Knight Foundation, which asked me to blog, has never left any comment at my blog or engaged me otherwise as a blogger. We have no relationship. (Why?)
Please let me know if it’s indeed important for you, as you state in your anticipated outcomes, that people post comments at my blog. I am reworking my Minciu Sodas laboratory’s websites and very likely I will redo my blog so that it works as a substream amongst a “stream” of activity at our lab. It will become part of a light weight project management system where comments and replies will be central and encouraged.
4. Were there any positive surprises? If so, please explain.
We had a wonderful meeting in London which included Samwel Kongere and Rachel Wambui Kungu of Kenya. I was very encouraged by Samwel as a person and by our strategy meeting with Pamela McLean and Franz Nahrada and our vision of global villages where we live.
I am also very grateful for work from Leon Benjamin for our global team to engage UK online communities and promote Mornflake cereal and their online video contest. We’ve had trouble including our African participants in this work because of bad Internet connections. Yet this is an example of the economic potential of the Includer. Our work on this promotion has pushed us to think fresh about our values and so we’re now working much more closely with Marcin Jakubowski, Ben de Vries, Jeremy Mason and Marcin Jakubowski of Factor E Farm, Masimba Biriwasha (Give A Book) of Zimbabwe, and Thomas Chepaitis, Foreign Minister of Uzhupis Republic. This has also allowed us to invest ourselves in our global team, in a network of online communities, and in websites that would support a responsive “help room”.
Technologically, we’re seeing the proliferation of netbooks, which are now available for $300 or so, and also e-book readers such as Amazon’s Kindle. This means that Includer, in some sense, is coming to life. Our contribution is to apply such tools to include those with marginal Internet access. Ricardo and Kennedy Owino are making giant steps with their Sneakernet project in Nairobi.

Will it take a new generation?
5. Please explain how you are meeting the overall goals stated in the anticipated outcomes.
I am blogging at my own website http://www.includer.org We are having organic activity, but it’s not taking place at the blog. I suspect that the Knight Foundation doesn’t care about the bigger picture and may (or may not) insist that I get the requisite (but unspecified number!) of links, comments and conversations. It’s not productive to do that at my blog. Instead, I am redoing our websites so that through them we can as a team respond effectively to incoming comments and also note actions to take by which we might help each other. I also want to aggregate our lab members’ blogs. When I pull this all together I expect to have a “blog” that will meet the Knight Foundation’s formal requirements. Yet please let me know if I shouldn’t worry about them.
6. How are you measuring your progress? Please attach copies of any evaluation reports, and list results of any measurements, such as Web traffic, downloads, registered users, monthly trends, etc.
I am measuring progress by considering how easy it is to cull material for my blog from our members’ letters and other content. Almost all of my posts are based on such material and that means that we have organic activity and a real purpose.
7. If you were publicizing the single most important outcome of your work, what headline would you write for your news release?
Mornflake engages the UK by way of Africa
8. What did you do to market the project? Was it successful? What would you do differently next time?
I am focusing on how our African participants might directly benefit. More and more, I’m trying to understand how we might all benefit from their activity on-the-ground, given their difficulty in participating through the Internet. This might include us blogging from our “global villages” and supporting local projects to try out new technologies, as Factor E Farm is doing in Missouri.
14. Please describe your plans in detail to sustain the project long term.
Business opportunities include open source math learning materials, worknets culture, a 24-hour help room, and Sneakernet services. I am awaiting results for a Nordplus proposal and the Sneakernet I have proposed for Ghor province, Afghanistan.
15. Did you collaborate with other organizations, particularly Knight Foundation grantees, during the course of this project? How?
Janet Feldman leads our Holistic Helping working group. She’s writing a handbook on “blogging positively” for Rising Voices.
16. Please describe your interaction with Knight Foundation staff. What was most useful and what changes would you suggest?
Nobody contacted me. I have not found anybody at the Knight Foundation who wants to help me.
17. Did you ever need Knight Foundation to help you facilitate contacts with experts in the field, professional peers and similar organizations? If so, was Knight Staff helpful?
Nobody contacted me. Nobody responded to my previous reports. I have not found anybody at the Knight Foundation who wants to help me. Please do contact me so that we might work well together!